Clio Wired reading response 1

In the introduction to Digital History: A Guide to Gathering, Preserving, and Presenting the Past on the Web by Dan Cohen and Roy Rosenzweig (2005), the authors outline “seven qualities of digital media and networks that potentially allow us to do things better.” These seven qualities include “capacity, accessibility, flexibility, diversity, manipulability, interactivity, and hypertextuality (or nonlinearity).” Five dangers of digital media and networks are also discussed and they include quality, durability, readability, passivity, and inaccessibility. The authors aren’t saying that digital media and networks change history but that digital media and networks change the way we do history.

Digital media and networks bring more information, more primary sources, and more unique voices to historians quicker than ever before. It is too much information and it is too disorganized for historians to realize its full potential. New digital tools might provide a way to explore the depths of this information overload and help historians find relevant data and present it to readers in an organized way.

Organizing information is not traditionally considered the realm of the historian, rather it is of the librarian or in today’s parlance the information professional. But as Cohen and Rosenzweig point out in their Mapping the History Web chapter, “the brute force of computer algorithms have proved far more useful than any human cataloging.” Tom Scheinfeldt seems to agree, in his essay Theory, Method, and Digital Humanities from Hacking the Academy (print 2013), that the field of librarianship has experienced a massive energy boost from working with digital tools and integrating new technologies into a traditional profession. Scheinfeldt encourages historians to do the same. He states, “…we are entering a new phase of scholarship that will be dominated not by ideas, but once again by organizing activities, both in terms of organizing knowledge, and organizing ourselves and our work.”

The article by Robert Townsend, How Is New Media Reshaping the Work of Historians? (2010) looks in detail at how historians are using technology and what that indicates about the profession. His article includes many charts, one of the most interesting to me is the breakdown of what tools historians are using according to type of user (power, active, passive, avoider). Even the avoiders are using almost all of the tools at some level. Townsends main interest though is how is the adoption of new technology changing publication choices.  I have trouble caring too much about this issue, since I am not in a position where I need to publish. But I do understand how it changes the profession and the scholarship that gets produced. Authors need money, as do publishers, so if everything is getting published for free than who is paying?

At the end of his article, Townsend calls for more time to see how the future of digital humanities and online publishing unfolds. In much the same vein, Scheinfeldt also suggests that we must continue to embrace and develop the digital humanities because in the future it might be more useful than we could imagine at this point in time.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Clio Wired reading response 1

  1. Libraries seemed to be tailor made for the kind of digital projects that are popular, mainly because their focus is collections and making them available to the public. There’s little interpretation that needs to be done for libraries and its more about presenting the information in new and engaging ways. The majority of History DH projects I’ve seen have been along the same lines, digitizing collections of letters, data mining text sources etc… which seems to work out great for Historians, Literary scholars and what not but you and I are Art Historians, and I’m personally struggling.

    There doesn’t seem to me to be a lot of focus on object based research and interpretation. Digitizing collections and the availability of sources online have been great for my research, but I’m having difficulty finding practical applications for DH projects in relation to my own project which really focuses on art as object. I can’t really data mine murals. There don’t seem to be many good object based projects out there, and I feel like Art History kind of gets left out of the DH conversation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s